Most EU-listed tankers are not under an asset freeze
Every one of the 672 vessels the EU currently lists sits in Annex XLII, a port and services ban. None is in the EU's financial sanctions file. That distinction changes what the listing does.
· figures as of 6 September 2026 euannex-xliimisconceptions
The most common error in coverage of sanctioned tankers is a single word: frozen.
When the European Union lists a vessel, reporting routinely says its assets have been frozen, or that the ship has been blacklisted in the way an oligarch’s bank account is. Check the instrument and that is not what happened.
What the data says
Every EU vessel listing in this database sits in Annex XLII of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014, the list made under Article 3s. That is 672 hulls. The number in the EU’s consolidated financial sanctions file, which is the asset-freeze list, is zero.
That is not a gap in our coverage. It is how the regime is built. Annex XLII is a port-access ban plus a prohibition on providing maritime services: bunkering, insurance, classification, crewing, technical assistance. It is not an asset freeze, so those vessels are deliberately absent from the financial sanctions file.
Anyone building a dataset from the financial sanctions file alone, which is the obvious place to look, will conclude the EU has listed no vessels at all.
Why the difference matters
An asset freeze prohibits dealings with property. A port ban closes a door.
A hull barred from EU ports can load in a third country, discharge in another, and use insurance and classification from providers outside the EU without breaching that regulation. Nothing in Annex XLII reaches a voyage that never touches Europe.
Of the 672 vessels the EU lists, 70 are listed by the EU alone. Those ships face a closed door in Europe and nothing else from the authorities tracked here. Describing them as frozen overstates their position by a wide margin, and the mistake runs in a specific direction: it makes the measure sound more total than it is.
The opposite error also exists. A US designation, formally narrower in jurisdiction, often bites harder in practice, because several US programs carry secondary-sanctions exposure that makes banks and insurers well outside the United States decline the business. In this database 1,206 hulls are listed by the United States alone.
What to write instead
Name the authority and the instrument. “Barred from EU ports and from EU maritime services under Annex XLII of Regulation 833/2014, since 24 April 2026” is precise, checkable, and no longer than the wrong version.
Every vessel page here carries the measure type for each listing and states in words which of the tracked authorities do not list the hull. The distinction is explained at length in asset freeze, port ban, services ban.
Worked examples from the data
Vessels the EU lists that the US and UK do not, generated live from the listings in this database rather than written into the article.
| Vessel | IMO | Flag | Type | First listed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAMAS WAVE | 8915299 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
| IRKUTSK | 9419084 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
| PERUN | 9582776 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
| ALBEDO | 9213313 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
| SVYATOI KNYAZ VLADIMIR | 9838864 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
| KRASNODAR | 9296781 | — | — | 24 Jul 2026 |
Figures in this post were computed on 6 September 2026 and are not updated afterwards. The statistics page always shows current numbers.